Information Flow

There are many elements that sanction an organization in being successful, however unity of the key elements is Information flow. In my Journal submission I will be describing the levels of converse, both good and bad, that are found within Johnson Matthey, my current employer. I will discuss the triple main busial approaches within my company that I let observed, and the three potential conversation barriers as well. The intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, organizational and intercultural levels of talks are all on display amongst the coworkers of Johnson Matthey.There are multiple levels within the headquarters, located in Wayne, PA. They are all providing the like product for the Oil and gasoline Industry. Each level contains up to 45 employees depending on the de tripment. Interpersonal communication is continuously conducted within distri moreoverively group so that nothing ever falls between the cracks. Individuals are al counsels communicating with themselves co llectible to the constant changes in materials needed, which requires them to be able to adapt to change quickly. The workforce here is largely diverse, loosely all men with degrees in The Sciences, but various impalegrounds and educational levels.We all work in groups, to each one department is tied to the next, therefore requiring tight nit and close communication. Every department is essentially like its have got clique, everyone talks ab push through the next department, and its kind of like lunch while in the cafeteria during high school. Depending on your department you can be looked at as a friend or an enemy, sadly in my line of work, its very hard to find people who support you and back you up unless they are in your department. The woman here are very jealous of each other, they take int like to be outshined, especially by newbies or those of us who are younger.This kind of manner can put a major dent on communication skills. Mostly to spite someone, but thats still not a responsible vogue to handle any situation. Information travels mainly in one direction from our customer (various Oil and Gas clients) to us. There are occasion when we have a little say so in the actual product but for the most part it is a one-sided show. We have our Regional Manager Andrew, our Offshore Manager Jim and our Operations Manager Roy. The way it starts is, the job comes into Andy, he determines if it is an Onshore or Offshore project.If it is determined to be offshore, it goes to Jim, he works out the schematics of personnel with Chris and myself. Any budget questions, equipment needs etc. have to be cleared by me and past run over by Roy for final approval. The channel used is generally email from the client to one of the site managers. The feedback comes once the work is complete and as long as we get a cabbage notch report, then we get a good pat on the back from upper management, and we jaunt on to the next project. The functions of Y Hierarchy of man agerial communications do exist within this organization.Our manager is continuously creating and encouraging a wonderful work environment and providing opportunities for employees to take the initiative and self-direction. Management is continuously looking for new ways for employees to make significant contributions within the organization. Behavioral, empowerment, and contingency are the three managerial communication approaches that I have observed within the organization that I currently work for. dominance is the distribution or en considerment of power or authority to his or hers subordinates within an organization.Generally used when upper management is out of work for certain amount of time. Empowerment also encourages the employees to get more involved with the organization. The contingency approach is seen a lot in our office. Our Operations Manager knows that there is more than one way to get an A+ on our work, and whichever way produces the best result with the least amount of money and time spent, is generally the path that is taken. This is probably the approach seen mostly around the Johnson Matthey organization because of the results that are produced.Behavioral approach comes with trust and ones individual character. Managers have been seen trusting and respecting the employees more now than ever due the mathematical product that each department has put out for our clients. Personality, emotional, and physical are the three potential barriers to effective communication within not just Johnson Matthey, but most organizations. Everyone here has their own personality and that can sometimes create an issue throughout the business day. Individuals are loaded with many traits that create personal attitudes, approaches, angles,quirks and polar views on the world, and how to handle various situations. There are many occasions in which this trait has stalled communication between two individuals and in some case hurt the overall job being done. activated barriers can by far be the worst thing out there, in terms of communication in a company. There are many individuals in my organization that let things go bang-up to their heads and forget that we are at the workplace. Emotions should not be brought to work with you at all, you should be able to face-off things off and move on with the job.Especially personal conflicts and personal issues. Your office and your coworkers are not the place to be dealing with those kinds of things. Managers are often seen using a softer touch to get through to the individuals with emotional issues. bodily barriers are one of the most common around my office though. There are many occasions that we are working with a wall between co-workers and with communication being the key to our success line will generally arise on occasions. We have made complaints on many occasions with the same results deal with it.