Wartime Propaganda: World War I :: World War I History

Wartime Propaganda World War IThe Drift To wards War Lead this community into war, and theyll forget there was ever such a thing as tolerance. To fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will memorialize into the very fiber of national life, infecting the Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street. It is one of historys great ironies that Woodrow Wilson, who was re- elected as a peace candidate in 1916, led America into the first world war. With the help of a propaganda apparatus that was unparalleled in world history, Wilson forged a nation of immigrants into a fleck consentaneous. An examination of public opinion before the war, propaganda efforts during the war, and the endurance of propaganda in peacetime raises significant questions about the viability of democracy as a governing principle. Like an undertow, Americas drift toward war was subtle and forceful. According to the outspoken pacifist Randolph Bourne, w ar sentiment spread gradually among various intellectual groups. With the aid of Roosevelt, wrote Bourne, the murmurs became a monotonous chant, and finally a chorus so mighty that to be out of it was at first to be disreputable, and finally almost obscene. Once the war was underway, dissent was practically impossible. If you believed our exhalation into this war was a mistake, wrote The Nation in a post-war editorial, if you held, as President Wilson did early in 1917, that the ideal outcome would be peace without victory, you were a traitor. Forced to kiosk quietly on the sidelines while their neighbors stampeded towards war, many pacifists would have agreed with Bertrand Russell that the greatest difficulty was the purely psychological one of resisting mass suggestion, of which the force becomes terrific when the whole nation is in a state of violent collective excitement. This frenzied support for the war was particularly remarkable in light of the fact that Wilsons re-electio n had been wide interpreted as a vote for peace. After all, in January of 1916, Wilson stated that so far as I can remember, this is a government of the passel, and this people is not going to choose war. In retrospect, it is apparent that the vote for Wilson cloaked profound cleavages in public opinion. At the time of his inauguration, immigrants constituted one leash of the population. Allied and German propaganda revived old-world loyalties among hyphenated European- Americans, and opinions about US intervention were sharply polarized.